Taking anyone’s life is a heinous crime that devastates family members, communities, and society as a whole. The harsh punishment serves like a deterrent to possible offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
The main target is over the intention to cause injury. This is a major problem: an especially low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
4. Record shows that the petitioner has been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is actually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service could be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to complete away with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to carry out away with the candidature of your petitioner. Read more
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it proper on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the check here appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision with the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is a horrifying reality, an extremely small threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're in the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion might be viewed as, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject to availability of vacancy topic on the approval with the competent authority.
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property can also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not specified her sufficient notice before raising her rent, citing a fresh state regulation that demands a minimum of ninety times’ notice. Martin argues that the new legislation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.